A couple more studio lighting shots using a different setup with a hairlight to the back and camera right.
Taken with Sony A900, Tamron 90mm lens and processed in Lightroom 3 Beta.
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Experimenting with studio lighting
I recently acquired a set of studio strobes - the Elinchrom D-Lite 4 kit. This contains two 400Ws heads, 2 stands, and 2 softboxes. I also added a snoot and grid, and a white translucent umbrella, plus some reflectors and background materials.
It is amazing what a difference it can make to a portrait. I have been mainly using window lighting for portraits, which has its own charm and look. But the control allowed by studio strobes is something else entirely. It's also great not to have to rely on the English weather to take photos.
Some of my first samples (all processed in Lightroom 3 Beta and taken with a Sony A900 and Minolta 70-210mm ' Beercan' lens).
This is one light with translucent umbrella at 45 degrees (to camera left) and a reflector on the right:
Some examples with Rembrandt lighting (a softbox high and to 45 degrees of the model on the camera's left and a reflector on the other side of the camera):
It is amazing what a difference it can make to a portrait. I have been mainly using window lighting for portraits, which has its own charm and look. But the control allowed by studio strobes is something else entirely. It's also great not to have to rely on the English weather to take photos.
Some of my first samples (all processed in Lightroom 3 Beta and taken with a Sony A900 and Minolta 70-210mm ' Beercan' lens).
This is one light with translucent umbrella at 45 degrees (to camera left) and a reflector on the right:
A softbox high and in front of the model, a reflector under the models face and a hairlight behind the model and to the right of the camera:
Some examples with Rembrandt lighting (a softbox high and to 45 degrees of the model on the camera's left and a reflector on the other side of the camera):
Finally the same setup, but with a softbox placed behind the model to camera right to highlight the other side of the face:
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Monochrome inkjet printing: The carbon on cotton principle
Printing monochrome images with inkjet printers has always been problematic. Mainly this is because mixing colour inks commonly found in inkjet printers rarely produces neutral monotone images. Prints made with colour ink often have ugly colour casts that are hard to get rid of or that exhibit severe metamerism (i.e. they look different under different lighting conditions). Also as colour inks fade at different rates these prints often exhibit unacceptable shifts in tone over time. The human eye is very susceptible to subtle changes in near neutral print tones.
However, recent developments in inkjet printing technology have begun to overcome some of the problems. For example, Epson's Advanced Black and White (ABW) system allows several different shades of grey inks to be used to produce nice black and white prints with varying tones. Prior to this a dedicated band of printers converted their Epson printers to accept monochrome inksets based on highly stable carbon pigments and printed on fine art papers that were supposed to be of archival quality. Carbon pigments are known to outlast most colour pigments by a wide margin.
Problems still remain with systems such as the Epson ABW system though. It has been shown that the Epson driver incorporates coloured inks to varying degrees in the ABW prints. For example, yellow, which is notorious for fading can clearly be seen in enlarged print scans (see, for example, http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/R1800-Lightfastness.pdf). Thus we don't really know how long these prints will look acceptable. A further problem is that longevity ratings for printer and paper combinations (such as those published by Wilhelm Imaging Research) are based on a 35% fade test which is a hangover from the days of traditional colour photography. In other words lightfastness ratings are based on a fade margin that many black and white darkroom workers would find unacceptable. According to Jon Cone (originator of the Piezography monochrome inksets) the human eye can perceive a 5% deterioration in density and therefore this is the figure he uses in his lightfastness tests. A good discussion of this can be found in a post by Jon Cone here.
Paul Roark (who designs monochromatic inksets for MIS Associates and has been a long time pioneer of monochrome inkjet printing techniques) argues that the best way to be sure we have the best archivally stable black and white inkjet prints is to use the 'carbon on cotton' principle. He has designed an inkset that is based purely on several dilutions of carbon pigment (known as Eboni-6) and he prints mainly on cotton based rag papers (which are known to museums to be the most stable and durable paper media that exist). These papers such as Arches Hot Press are reknowned for their archival stability.
So how does one go about it? I recently mixed my own carbon-based inkset for my old Epson 2100 printer based on Paul Roark's formulae. It was surprisingly easy to do and the chemistry required is readily available. I ordered a large bottle of the Eboni black ink from the USA which will last a long time and is used to create the various shades of grey ink. These were injected into a set of refillable cartridges (from Marrutt in the UK). By using a black and white RIP such as Bowhaus Inkjet Control or the inexpensive Quadtone RIP it is fairly straightforward to profile various papers to produce nice images (although a densitometer or spectrophotometer is recommended, but you can use a scanner). It is also incredibly cheap to mix your own inks.
Useful links:
http://www.paulroark.com/
http://www.inkjetmall.com/
http://www.inksupply.com/
http://www.marrutt.com/ (UK)
http://www.bowhaus.com/
http://www.quadtonerip.com/
Digital black and white group
Piezography group
However, recent developments in inkjet printing technology have begun to overcome some of the problems. For example, Epson's Advanced Black and White (ABW) system allows several different shades of grey inks to be used to produce nice black and white prints with varying tones. Prior to this a dedicated band of printers converted their Epson printers to accept monochrome inksets based on highly stable carbon pigments and printed on fine art papers that were supposed to be of archival quality. Carbon pigments are known to outlast most colour pigments by a wide margin.
Problems still remain with systems such as the Epson ABW system though. It has been shown that the Epson driver incorporates coloured inks to varying degrees in the ABW prints. For example, yellow, which is notorious for fading can clearly be seen in enlarged print scans (see, for example, http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/R1800-Lightfastness.pdf). Thus we don't really know how long these prints will look acceptable. A further problem is that longevity ratings for printer and paper combinations (such as those published by Wilhelm Imaging Research) are based on a 35% fade test which is a hangover from the days of traditional colour photography. In other words lightfastness ratings are based on a fade margin that many black and white darkroom workers would find unacceptable. According to Jon Cone (originator of the Piezography monochrome inksets) the human eye can perceive a 5% deterioration in density and therefore this is the figure he uses in his lightfastness tests. A good discussion of this can be found in a post by Jon Cone here.
Paul Roark (who designs monochromatic inksets for MIS Associates and has been a long time pioneer of monochrome inkjet printing techniques) argues that the best way to be sure we have the best archivally stable black and white inkjet prints is to use the 'carbon on cotton' principle. He has designed an inkset that is based purely on several dilutions of carbon pigment (known as Eboni-6) and he prints mainly on cotton based rag papers (which are known to museums to be the most stable and durable paper media that exist). These papers such as Arches Hot Press are reknowned for their archival stability.
So how does one go about it? I recently mixed my own carbon-based inkset for my old Epson 2100 printer based on Paul Roark's formulae. It was surprisingly easy to do and the chemistry required is readily available. I ordered a large bottle of the Eboni black ink from the USA which will last a long time and is used to create the various shades of grey ink. These were injected into a set of refillable cartridges (from Marrutt in the UK). By using a black and white RIP such as Bowhaus Inkjet Control or the inexpensive Quadtone RIP it is fairly straightforward to profile various papers to produce nice images (although a densitometer or spectrophotometer is recommended, but you can use a scanner). It is also incredibly cheap to mix your own inks.
Useful links:
http://www.paulroark.com/
http://www.inkjetmall.com/
http://www.inksupply.com/
http://www.marrutt.com/ (UK)
http://www.bowhaus.com/
http://www.quadtonerip.com/
Digital black and white group
Piezography group
Saturday, October 10, 2009
The 'Beercan' and the Sony A900
After reading a lot about the old line of Minolta autofocus lenses I decided to pick up a 'Beercan'. This is a 70-210mm f4 lens that was introduced in 1985. It has a great reputation as being a solid, sharp lens with nice bokeh. They are pretty cheap too. I gave it a try this afternoon in low light and high ISO on the Sony A900. I am pretty impressed with it (and the camera so far). The lens is big and heavy (hence the nickname, I presume).
This shot is with the A900 set at ISO 1600 with the beercan at f4.5 and 75mm. Shot cRAW with no noise reduction, just Lightroom for the conversion:
This shot is with the A900 set at ISO 1600 with the beercan at f4.5 and 75mm. Shot cRAW with no noise reduction, just Lightroom for the conversion:
Bigger versions are here.
Sunday, October 04, 2009
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Sony Alpha A900
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













